I've had dealings with Charles Morgan on and off over the years, and with Dick Miller before him. Charles stands behind his merchandise, and I've never known him to be reluctant to take something back if the buyer is unhappy for any reason. He has always been a great guy to deal with, from my perspective!
It is true, however, that the replicas can only be as good as the masters, and some of Dick's models were considerably the worse for wear when he used them to start making replicas. Dick's early models had an "R" in a raised diamond on the bottom. You will occasionally see these on Ebay being passed off as originals. I saw a couple just last week. Dick finally realized that some unscrupulous buyers were getting models from him and then sanding off the "R", so he stopped the practice as not being worth the effort.
While I've been fooled on occasion, it is usually easy to tell a replica from an original. Originals were produced in molds under pressures of several tons per square inch. The replicas cure under atmospheric pressure. What this means from a practical standpoint is that replicas will usually have small pits in them. Where any air was "squeezed" out of the originals under the pressures they were subjected to in manufacture, the replicas will have small occlusions, usually at the bottoms of control surfaces, in the corners of canopies, around nacelles, around markings, etc. it's possible to correct these flaws, but it is a time-consuming and labor-intensive effort, which means there is no one I know out there trying to make a business of this practice.
The replicas are all one-piece models, ignoring landing gear and floats. They are also solid models, not hollow like the large Cruvers. As a consequence, a replica B-17 or B-24 probably weighs twice as much as an original model.
Regards to all! -- Bryan
