Climb Mt Niitaka
Guadalcanal



The Dinky version
Moderator: johnbeugels
grwebster wrote:Guy, I had a metal piece of a red meatball from a wrecked zero in my collection for years that a US soldier brought back.
The aluminum was very thin and easily bent {like an alu beer can, almost} which shouldn't have been a surprise as that was both the Zero's major strength {lightness hence agility and speed} and its major weakness {general structural weakness leading to inflight breakups when lightly damaged } or so I have been told.
Of course the lack of self sealing fuel tanks were a huge factor, too, no?
But what was astounding was that the unpainted side of the piece of the Zero I had was treated with a glossy, blue/gree/touquoise shellac-like product that had the exact same color as the original, standard issue Dinky Toys Zero that you posted.
Often wondered about that - could Dinky have used a similar sample? Its odd as the normal colors of the zero were well known by then and your reconditioned ones show them both well. So why didn't they use one of those? Who knows.
I thought about asking about this issue on a very active site/forum for serious Dinky collectors in the UK, but they seem to all focus on prewar items and only rarely on postwar issues, and mainly then its the early {pre 1965} issues that interest them, and then, too, its mostly about wheeled vehicles.
The post 1965 'big planes' are never discussed.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest